Optimistic Interrupt Protection

Predictable response time of out-of-band handlers to IRQ receipts requires the in-band kernel work not to be allowed to delay them by masking interrupts in the CPU.

However, critical sections delimited this way by the in-band code must still be enforced for the root stage, so that system integrity is not at risk. This means that although out-of-band IRQ handlers may run at any time while the head stage is accepting interrupts, in-band IRQ handlers should be allowed to run only when the root stage is accepting interrupts too. So we need to decouple the interrupt masking and delivery logic which applies to the head stage from the one in effect on the root stage, by implementing a dual interrupt control.

Virtual interrupt disabling

To this end, a software logic managing a virtual interrupt disable flag is introduced by the interrupt pipeline between the hardware and the generic IRQ management layer. This logic can mask IRQs from the perspective of the in-band kernel work when local_irq_save(), local_irq_disable() or any lock-controlled masking operations like spin_lock_irqsave() is called, while still accepting IRQs from the CPU for immediate delivery to out-of-band handlers.

When a real IRQ arrives while interrupts are virtually masked, the event is logged for the receiving CPU, kept there until the virtual interrupt disable flag is cleared at which point it is dispatched as if it just happened. The principle of deferring interrupt delivery based on a software flag coupled to an event log has been originally described as Optimistic interrupt protection in this paper. It was originally intended as a low-overhead technique for manipulating the processor interrupt state, reducing the cost of interrupt masking for the common case of absence of interrupts.

In Dovetail’s two-stage pipeline, the head stage protects from interrupts by disabling them in the CPU’s status register as usual, while the root stage disables interrupts only virtually. A stage for which interrupts are disabled is said to be stalled. Conversely, unstalling a stage means re-enabling interrupts for it.

Obviously, stalling the head stage implicitly means disabling further IRQ receipts for the root stage too.

Interrupt deferral for the root stage

When the root stage is stalled because the virtual interrupt disable flag is set, any IRQ event which was not immediately delivered to the head stage is recorded into a per-CPU log, postponing delivery to the in-band kernel handler.

Such delivery is deferred until the in-band kernel code clears the virtual interrupt disable flag by calling local_irq_enable() or any of its variants, which unstalls the root stage. When this happens, the interrupt state is resynchronized by playing the log, firing the in-band handlers for which an IRQ event is pending.

   /* Both stages unstalled on entry */
   <IRQx received: no out-of-band handler>
       (pipeline logs IRQx event)
       (pipeline plays IRQx event)

If the root stage is unstalled at the time of the IRQ receipt, the in-band handler is immediately invoked, just like with the non-pipelined IRQ model.

All interrupts are (seemingly) NMIs

From the standpoint of the in-band kernel code (i.e. the one running over the root interrupt stage) , the interrupt pipelining logic virtually turns all device IRQs into NMIs, for running out-of-band handlers.

For this reason, out-of-band code may generally NOT re-enter in-band code, for preventing creepy situations like this one:

   /* in-band context */
   spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
      <IRQx received: out-of-band handler installed>
            /* attempted re-entry to in-band from out-of-band. */
               spin_lock_irqsave(&lock, flags);
   spin_unlock irqrestore(&lock, flags);

Even in absence of an attempt to get a spinlock recursively, the outer in-band code in the example above is entitled to assume that no access race can occur on the current CPU while interrupts are masked. Re-entering in-band code from an out-of-band handler would invalidate this assumption.

In rare cases, we may need to fix up the in-band kernel routines in order to allow out-of-band handlers to call them. Typically, atomic helpers are such routines, which serialize in-band and out-of-band callers.

For all other cases, the IRQ work API is available for scheduling the execution of a routine from the head stage, which will be invoked later from the root stage as soon as it gets back in control on the current CPU.